Sustainable development: the human dimension

* Report defining the concept of sustainable development and its three dimensions: economic, ecological and human
** See the texts of the Brundtland Report on these subjects quoted in our Citations and Reference Documents sections.

Factors enabling this harmonious development include:  

  • the ability to meet basic needs

  • health

  • education (school, university, etc.)

  • social equity

  • social ties  

  • social cohesion

  • education in a culture of peace, values, ethics, interpersonal, intercultural, critical and citizenship skills

  • a sense of responsibility, or even more of a soul, for the fate of human beings, the living world and the planet

  • awareness of the factors that destroy economies, ecosystems and human life, and of those who build them

  • freedom of thought (…)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————-

Other references:

An article in the journal Développement Durable et Territoires (1) provides the following details on the human and social dimensions of sustainable development:

The human dimension of sustainable development can be understood as the search for a form of development that ensures the improvement of human well-being (or its maintenance), the latter being determined by personal characteristics (education, health, individual freedoms, etc.) or collective characteristics (social cohesion, level and distribution of wealth, etc.).

It includes:

  • human development in the strict sense, in particular the level of health, education and knowledge of individuals

  • socially socially sustainable (which) can be understood as development that preserves
    (and if possible improves):

    • the social cohesion of an entire society (and not just part of it)

    • people’s access to social services and public goods

    • passing on skills to future generations.

(1) Human development, sustainable development and “developing countries”:
      How to articulate and measure the different dimensions, Bruno Boidin, Nov. 7. 2004.

(Note: bolding and italics are our own).

Type: Dictionary